Frank Ogden, the Canadian Futuristsaid that if Rip Van Winkle had fallen asleep in the year 500 AD and perhaps not awakened until now, he’d have realized that all had changed except for a few things. . .the schools and church. As for me, I’d put in the urge for procreation and the quest for power but let’s put those aside. The church is the church. People generally will need to believe that there is a higher force on the market which may help the church in its many forms provides the stage for it.
The church is not a very innovative ssru. That is a given. Neither, I’m afraid are all schools. Schools are still teaching essentially exactly the exact things they educated in the season 500. I agree with Frank on that. But look around you. Examine the rate at which technology is changing the world. Are schools maintaining? Hardly. Most learning is still done through textbooks. I grant you that they frequently have audiovisual support now but consider those textbooks. A university text can certainly cost more than $100. I’ve taught courses where the writing was $150! The regrettable issue is a text book takes three to five years to become developed and printed; encourage substances inserted after which for schools to match it in their curricula. By that time, guess what? It’s usually outdated! Too many things have happened within the previous five years and even before the book hits the stands it takes revision.
Education should remove its own rose-coloured glasses and consider what is happening in the world! Many of those in academia have never functioned; not been at the workplace and have little real comprehension of exactly what is taking place. Universities and professors in their characteristically outmoded bowties are still ramble around hallowed corridors and sculpted campuses blissfully unaware of their requirements of the actual world. I understand! I know! It isn’t their fault – it’s the machine. Bull droppings! Change begins with the average person and works its way upward to where something else can be carried out.
In Thailand, the government has been on education reform since I first came some 24 decades ago. Do you know what has happened? Nothing significant I can easily see. Lip-service mostly. Continual improvements in the government haven’t helped the problem any. Back in the past couple of months, the Ministry of Education decided that schools don’t need to instruct so much English (the worldwide language of business and therefore the near future employers of Thai students) therefore they’ve told all schools to return to three lessons per week. Is this a progressive measure? You let me!
I still remember when a then government here in the Kingdom decided that all schools should be computerized and so it placed computers into every faculty. Laudable. . .except that 200 of those schools did not even have electricity, not to mention any familiarity with computers or personnel capable of hooking them up. Ah well. . .the thought was there. Fore-sight, thinking and planning go together.
Consider also that many children nowadays pay up to 80% of their hours facing either a television or a laptop monitor. In reality, many children are a lot more aware of what’s really going on in the world compared to their parents ‘ – let alone their professors or teachers. Are we using the way kids learn and wish to learn these days? Are we listening and watching? Not nearly enough.
Our school from Chonburi Province in Thailand grew from 1 construction, 1-2 teachers and roughly 100 students in 1967 to eight buildings, 200 teachers and 4000 students. Classrooms are typically non judgmental. Some don’t really have somewhere to plug in a CD player. Oh, also you will find 40-46 students in every class. However it has a sound lab and also two new computer labs. Progress!
This past year that the institution opened its own brand new construction because of their Gifted Programme (students with GPA of 3.2 or better) along with their planned English Programme. Classrooms are stateoftheart. Each classroom has a teacher control computer, microphone and LCD projector All classrooms have aircon and five Internet-ready computers at the back of the room for students. Students are utilised to being stimulated by TV and nearly most of them have computers at the home therefore visual lessons have more impact. Learning takes place faster and is kept more. Books have their place but interactive, hands on lessons are more inspiring and intriguing compared to the printed page. A science lab and library are also in the works. This is just a faculty that’s focusing to reality from a technological perspective. It appears to be from the minority.
All this is nice and dandy but the true question would be: Are schools teaching students the skills of the jobs they’ll soon be planning to in 5 -15 decades or are they still teaching out of the year 500? Why do we teach complex t? Studies show that most girls by the age of 1-5 hate it and avoid it like the plague. Most boys might as well when they could.
Cheating has always been a no no in schools. In Thailand, in a course of 45, perhaps 3 students is going to perform their assignments and the others will copy those off. It’s easy to spot the same errors occurring in various laptops. However, I sometimes take a contrarian opinion and wonder when we shouldn’t be thinking of it because collaborative instruction. Do we really need to know all the answers or is it enough to learn where to find the solutions we need? Isn’t that why businesses hire specialists and teamwork is flaunted as the thing to do? Surely complex math is something which computers could perform better and a whole lot faster compared to the typical student brain? 95% of students won’t ever use advanced math in their careers yet we still drill everyone senseless in algebra, trigonometry and calculus. Well, that is exactly what they educated from the year 500 with no body has ever told me in a change in the program. Uh huh! Wouldn’t it be better to teach students how to approach a issue and how to instruct your computer to work up the clear answer? I know. . .who will confirm the computer’s work? The other man working on exactly the exact same problem through a computer.